Re: [Bacula-users] An idea for a feature (not a request yet :) - weighted concurrency

2009-03-21 Thread James Harper
> > I have half an idea for a feature request but it's not well defined > > yet... > > > > Basically, I have a bunch of clients to back up, some are on gigabit > > network and some are stuck on 100mbit. They are being backed up to a > > disk that has throughput of around 20-30mbytes/second. > > > >

Re: [Bacula-users] An idea for a feature (not a request yet :) - weighted concurrency

2009-03-20 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 20.03.2009 11:24, James Harper wrote: > I have half an idea for a feature request but it's not well defined > yet... > > Basically, I have a bunch of clients to back up, some are on gigabit > network and some are stuck on 100mbit. They are being backed up to a > disk that has throughput of ar

[Bacula-users] An idea for a feature (not a request yet :) - weighted concurrency

2009-03-20 Thread James Harper
I have half an idea for a feature request but it's not well defined yet... Basically, I have a bunch of clients to back up, some are on gigabit network and some are stuck on 100mbit. They are being backed up to a disk that has throughput of around 20-30mbytes/second. I am allowing 2 jobs to run a