> > I think I remember some thoughts from Kern about implementing this ;).
> > Back from the end
> > of 2004.
>
> I don't have any problem implementing better statistics, but it is not on
the
> top of my personal priority list (nor what users voted on), so I am
waiting
> for a patch to arrive.
On Saturday 01 July 2006 09:39, Mindaugas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now in reports that Bacula sends after backup Rate is calculated simply
> dividing
> SD Bytes written by Elapsed time.
> But since I'm using data spooling and doing multiple backups at the same
> time this
> number means absolutely
Hello,
Now in reports that Bacula sends after backup Rate is calculated simply
dividing
SD Bytes written by Elapsed time.
But since I'm using data spooling and doing multiple backups at the same
time this
number means absolutely nothing.
It would be much more useful to get another two nu
