thanks,
On 20 October 2015 at 11:02, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 19/10/15 22:08, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> On 10/19/2015 03:53 PM, Thing wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone backing total volumes of this order? and if so, what sort of
> scaling, design, hardware?
>
> I take it, that's the size of your fil
On 10/19/2015 04:49 PM, Thing wrote:
> Multiple NFS file systems on a NAS array. 500TB total, 350TB used.
> Research data, much of it rarely accessed, after 1 year things like climate
> data up to 30 years old, probably highly compressible. Suspect multiple
> bacula backup instances to distribut
ert Candey
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 350TB backup
From: Thing
To: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: "Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net"
Date: Mon Oct 19 20
On 19/10/15 22:08, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 03:53 PM, Thing wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone backing total volumes of this order? and if so, what sort of
>> scaling, design, hardware?
> I take it, that's the size of your filesystems? Not the estimated size
> of the backup set (i.e. all c
Multiple NFS file systems on a NAS array. 500TB total, 350TB used.
Research data, much of it rarely accessed, after 1 year things like climate
data up to 30 years old, probably highly compressible. Suspect multiple
bacula backup instances to distribute the load? Growth about 30tb a year.
On 20
On 10/19/2015 03:53 PM, Thing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone backing total volumes of this order? and if so, what sort of
> scaling, design, hardware?
I take it, that's the size of your filesystems? Not the estimated size
of the backup set (i.e. all cycles in retention period)?
--
Dimitri Maziuk
P
Hi,
Is anyone backing total volumes of this order? and if so, what sort of
scaling, design, hardware?
regards
Steven
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourc