On Monday 08 August 2005 09:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit
> > processors are 32
> > bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large
> > memory support. So,
> > there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on
> > x86-64 processors.
> >
> > Dan
> With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit
> processors are 32
> bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large
> memory support. So,
> there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on
> x86-64 processors.
>
> Dan
Not to start a flame war but that is only for intel
processors. AMD64 i
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 11:56 -0500, Dan Johansson wrote:
> With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit processors are 32
> bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large memory support. So,
> there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on x86-64 processors.
I know they can run the binar
With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit processors are 32
bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large memory support. So,
there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on x86-64 processors.
Dan
On 8/8/05, Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any concerns with usin
Are there any concerns with using a 32bit built bacula-fd on an x86_64
host?
What about an x86_64 client to a 32bit server?
--
Jesse Keating
GameHouse -- Systems Engineer
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
