On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:10:27 +0200, Simon Ekstrand wrote:
> 2009/4/23 Ulrich Leodolter :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 09:54 +0200, Simon Ekstrand wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I thought I'd just put in a note that we have just done a successful
>>> upgrade to bacula 3.0 for a bacula system running
2009/4/23 Ulrich Leodolter :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 09:54 +0200, Simon Ekstrand wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I thought I'd just put in a note that we have just done a successful
>> upgrade to bacula 3.0 for a bacula system running 7 storage daemons
>> with a total of ~70 TB data (all disk based, no
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 09:54 +0200, Simon Ekstrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought I'd just put in a note that we have just done a successful
> upgrade to bacula 3.0 for a bacula system running 7 storage daemons
> with a total of ~70 TB data (all disk based, no tapes). Everything is
> running smoot
Hi,
I thought I'd just put in a note that we have just done a successful
upgrade to bacula 3.0 for a bacula system running 7 storage daemons
with a total of ~70 TB data (all disk based, no tapes). Everything is
running smoothly so far.
The catalog in use is a mysql db totaling approximatly 110 GB.
