Re: [Bacula-users] 2.0.3 agents with 1.36 backend

2007-07-12 Thread Rich
On 2007.07.11. 21:19, Rich wrote: > is it possible to use 2.0.3 (or even 2.2) agents with 1.36 director/sd ? i can report that a test backup and restore were performed succesfully with 1.36.1 director/sd and 2.0.3 fd. -- Rich ---

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.0.3 agents with 1.36 backend

2007-07-12 Thread tomasz dereszynski
Rich wrote: > is it possible to use 2.0.3 (or even 2.2) agents with 1.36 director/sd ? > > this is intended only as a temporary solution until serverside is > upgraded (1.36 agent fails to compile on a recent system) i have situation with 2.0.3 as dir and 1.3.36 as fd and this works i think but

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.0.3 agents with 1.36 backend

2007-07-11 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rich wrote: > is it possible to use 2.0.3 (or even 2.2) agents with 1.36 director/sd ? > > this is intended only as a temporary solution until serverside is > upgraded (1.36 agent fails to compile on a recent system) Well the strict answer would be:

[Bacula-users] 2.0.3 agents with 1.36 backend

2007-07-11 Thread Rich
is it possible to use 2.0.3 (or even 2.2) agents with 1.36 director/sd ? this is intended only as a temporary solution until serverside is upgraded (1.36 agent fails to compile on a recent system) -- Rich - This SF.net em