Re: [Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change - Reformated

2006-11-06 Thread Robert Nelson
Title: RE: [Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change - Reformated Ask and ye shall receive J  I just committed a change to use the configured location instead of assuming /etc/bacula.   From: Robert Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 7:46 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change - Reformated

2006-10-24 Thread Robert Nelson
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 6:53 PM To: Robert Nelson; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change - Reformated Robert, Does the standard location mean a standard of

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change - Reformated

2006-10-24 Thread novosirj
, but could not). -Original Message- From: Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: [Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change - Reformated Date: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:42 pm Size: 4K To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry about the first mail, the formatting got s

[Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change - Reformated

2006-10-24 Thread Robert Nelson
Sorry about the first mail, the formatting got screwed up so that it was one long line, probably related to starting with a copy of the commit email.     For those of you using the 1.39.x beta releases, I just committed some changes to the CVS (Version 1.39.27).   The biggest chang

[Bacula-users] 1.39.x Beta Change

2006-10-24 Thread Robert Nelson
For those of you using the 1.39.x beta releases, I just committed some changes to the CVS (Version 1.39.27). The biggest change applies to all platforms.  As a result of this change it should no longer be necessary to supply a –c option or have the configuration files in the current directory