Re: [Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-09 Thread Alan Brown
On 05/03/15 09:25, tonyalbers wrote: > Now I just need to find out if we can also use the T1D drives we're > considering.. As Simone said: "As long as it's recognized by the system as a tape device/library it is supported by Bacula." Bacula uses standard interfaces, so as long as a tape d

[Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-05 Thread tonyalbers
Thanks everyone, sounds like it's going to work fine. Now I just need to find out if we can also use the T1D drives we're considering.. /tony +-- |This was sent by tony.alb...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to

Re: [Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-05 Thread Cejka Rudolf
tonyalbers wrote (2015/03/05): > Thanks Davide, that's excellent news. > > If anyone else has got anything to add, please do. Hello, almost nothing. I have five-modules SL-150 with one LTO-5 and one LTO-6 over SAS and under FreeBSD and without any problem. Just I have bought it when it was very

Re: [Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-05 Thread Simone Caronni
So far, any library or single tape device I've ever thrown at Bacula on RHEL/Fedora does work. As long as it's recognized by the system as a tape device/library it is supported by Bacula. I've tested SCSI, USB, iSCSI, SAS units in various DAT/LTO combinations. USB devices have always been single t

Re: [Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-05 Thread Roberts, Ben
Hi Tony, > Has anyone got any experience using bacula with the Storagetek SL-3000? > Or the SL-150 for that matter (they should behave the same way for what > I'm told) > > I'm looking for real-life experience here, not something like "if it can > be managed with mtx, then it _should_ work.." I

[Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-05 Thread tonyalbers
Thanks Davide, that's excellent news. If anyone else has got anything to add, please do. /tony +-- |This was sent by tony.alb...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--

Re: [Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-05 Thread Davide Giunchi
> A: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Inviato: Giovedì, 5 marzo 2015 7:14:24 > Oggetto: [Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences > Hi guys, > > Has anyone got any experience using bacula with the Storagetek SL-3000? Or > the > SL-150 for that matter (they should behave the same w

[Bacula-users] STK SL-3000 experiences

2015-03-04 Thread tonyalbers
Hi guys, Has anyone got any experience using bacula with the Storagetek SL-3000? Or the SL-150 for that matter (they should behave the same way for what I'm told) I'm looking for real-life experience here, not something like "if it can be managed with mtx, then it _should_ work.." Thanks in a