Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-08-24 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 07/26/14 14:11, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > Once a volume is marked disabled, Bacula should do *nothing* with it. We > might even consider if we want to turn off pruning of disabled volumes, > but I am not sure that would be a good idea as it could lead to a > catalog that grows. > > Best

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-27 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Bill, I Read all the posts and just one question: you are working with scripts for setting enabled flag in catalog for your needs. And what about working with "inchanger" flag instead? Setting your volumes inchanger flag to zero should not do the work you need? I mean, with inchager flag set to

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-27 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 07/27/14 12:19, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Hi Bill, > > I'm not aware about the previous discussion about enabled/disabled volumes. > But talking about this post, why do you have to put them disabled if you use > them later? Shouldn't volumes be disabled just if they never will be used > aga

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-27 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Bill, I'm not aware about the previous discussion about enabled/disabled volumes. But talking about this post, why do you have to put them disabled if you use them later? Shouldn't volumes be disabled just if they never will be used again? Retention periods and the other directives for recyclin

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-27 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 07/26/14 14:11, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > Once a volume is marked disabled, Bacula should do *nothing* with it. Right, I guess I kind of agree with this sentiment. My problem was that since Bacula was abiding by and acting on retention periods, I came to the conclusion that their scra

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Once a volume is marked disabled, Bacula should do *nothing* with it. We might even consider if we want to turn off pruning of disabled volumes, but I am not sure that would be a good idea as it could lead to a catalog that grows. Best regards, Kern On 07/26/2014 07:37 PM, Bill Arlofski w

[Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-26 Thread Bill Arlofski
OK, since I am having such a nice conversation with myself, I thought I would re-open this issue and continue on. OK, that is not the real reason. hehe :) Kern, I use vchanger with several removable eSATA drives, and also use a script I wrote to set the Enabled field when I change drives whic

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-24 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 07/24/14 19:54, Bill Arlofski wrote: > --[snip]-- > Pool: Offsite-eSATA-Diff > | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes | VolFiles | > VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType| LastWritten > | > > 3,565 | c0_0002_0064 | Purged| 0 | 10,7

[Bacula-users] Purged volumes not being moved to recycling pool

2014-07-24 Thread Bill Arlofski
Using version 7.0.4 with vchanger and several removable SATA drives each with (69) 10GB volumes on them. I have magazine #2 inserted with volumes c0_0002_0001 through c0_0002_0069 and Bacula has access to it. I have three main pools: Offsite-eSATA-Full Offsite-eSATA-Diff Offsite-eSATA-Inc plu