derbysig wrote:
> I see.
> So the main issue is actually the OS itself and not Bacula.
> I will research and test it out myself if my current OS can support LTO5 then.
If you can talk to the drives using standard "mt" commands then you can
talk to them using Bacula.
I've seen no difference under
I see.
So the main issue is actually the OS itself and not Bacula.
I will research and test it out myself if my current OS can support LTO5 then.
Thanks for the answer guys! You guys rock!
+--
|This was sent by derby...@gmail.com
derbysig wrote:
> Anybody helping in this? I am very interested to know about this too, as I am
> using a LTO3 and will most likely be upgrading to a LTO5 somewhere end of
> this year.
> Hope to learn from the replies from the knowledgeable people here!
I have an Overland Neo8000 and a Neo4000
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 AM, derbysig wrote:
> Anybody helping in this? I am very interested to know about this too, as I am
> using a LTO3 and will most likely be upgrading to a LTO5 somewhere end of
> this year.
> Hope to learn from the replies from the knowledgeable people here!
Remember
Anybody helping in this? I am very interested to know about this too, as I am
using a LTO3 and will most likely be upgrading to a LTO5 somewhere end of this
year.
Hope to learn from the replies from the knowledgeable people here!
+
Hi Everyone,
I have a backup server that is running on Debian Etch 4.0.
I have bacula version 2.4.2 installed, and working with a HP 1/8 Ultrium 920
G2 Autoloader, with Ultrium-3 tapes.
However, the Autoloader has spoilt, and I am looking to setup a new tape
system for me backup server.
Generally
