Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-27 Thread baculamail
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 26.10.2012 20:00, schrieb noob1321: >> So after some work with Comcast and tinkering around we found that the >> problem is actually Bacula. By doing speed tests from the client machine we >> saw that before we started using bacula it was around

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-27 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 26.10.2012 20:00, schrieb noob1321: > So after some work with Comcast and tinkering around we found that the > problem is actually Bacula. By doing speed tests from the client machine we > saw that before we started using bacula it was around 25down 6up but when > using Bacula the speed chang

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-26 Thread dweimer
On 2012-10-26 15:33, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > Zitat von noob1321 : > >> You didn't tell us how the line speed is, could that be an issue? >> You could also look at if the files are small, small filesizes = bad >> performance. >> >> if your network connection is speedy and the files are small yo

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-26 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von noob1321 : > You didn't tell us how the line speed is, could that be an issue? > You could also look at if the files are small, small filesizes = bad > performance. > > if your network connection is speedy and the files are small you could > compress chunks of the data before backing up

[Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-26 Thread noob1321
You didn't tell us how the line speed is, could that be an issue? You could also look at if the files are small, small filesizes = bad performance. if your network connection is speedy and the files are small you could compress chunks of the data before backing up. how does the backup perfor

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-26 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 10/26/2012 08:56 AM, Paul Van Wambeke wrote: > > Hi > > I had very slow backup times with a Ubuntu server 10.04 running the > Bacula director, 5.01 and handling a Windows 2008 R2 server with > Bacula-fd 5.2. I discovered that the throughput of the ethernet adapter > (broadcom) in the Windo

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Van Wambeke
Hi I had very slow backup times with a Ubuntu server 10.04 running the Bacula director, 5.01 and handling a Windows 2008 R2 server with Bacula-fd 5.2. I discovered that the throughput of the ethernet adapter (broadcom) in the Windows Server was VERY low .. I solved the problem after some

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-25 Thread Melissari, Ryan Joseph
October 25, 2012 10:48:30 AM Subject: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow Hey Guys, I have my Director, DB, and Storage on a server running CentOS 6. I am backing up a client over the network that is physically about 15 miles away and is running a Windows 2008 R2 Small Business Server . I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-25 Thread dweimer
On 2012-10-25 10:48, noob1321 wrote: > Hey Guys, > I have my Director, DB, and Storage on a server running CentOS 6. I > am backing up a client over the network that is physically about 15 > miles away and is running a Windows 2008 R2 Small Business Server . > I'm backing up 170 gigabytes. Right no

[Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-25 Thread noob1321
Hey Guys, I have my Director, DB, and Storage on a server running CentOS 6. I am backing up a client over the network that is physically about 15 miles away and is running a Windows 2008 R2 Small Business Server . I'm backing up 170 gigabytes. Right now the job has been running for 37 minutes an