Hi,
23.08.2007 13:25,, Frank Sweetser wrote::
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Currently, I'm simply ignoring this problem, but I think that a more
>> sophisticated active check would be better... like, set the status to
>> "Ok, no backups expected" when the script is called on Saturday or
>> Sunday, a
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Currently, I'm simply ignoring this problem, but I think that a more
> sophisticated active check would be better... like, set the status to
> "Ok, no backups expected" when the script is called on Saturday or
> Sunday, and on Mondays check when the job was finished the Mon
Hi,
23.08.2007 11:10,, Allan Black wrote::
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> (By the way: This is one of the reasons why I don't rely on the mail
>> messages to monitor backup operations. Nagios is my choice of
>> monitoring toolkit.)
>
> Hi, Arno - that's interesting. How do you do the monitoring - do
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> (By the way: This is one of the reasons why I don't rely on the mail
> messages to monitor backup operations. Nagios is my choice of
> monitoring toolkit.)
Hi, Arno - that's interesting. How do you do the monitoring - do you
use passive checks, run from a Run After Job scri
