ne thing i am missing are patched packages, rpm and also deb packages
> > have a mechanism to include patch files an apply during build
process.
> >
> > For most bacula users it would be much easier to apply patches by
"rpm
> > -U ..." or "dpkg install ...".
>
> Yes, but you have to build, test an
On Sunday 26 October 2008 12:38:22 Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> "Kern Sibbald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Saturday 25 October 2008 21:53:00 Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 21:11 +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> >> > Le Saturday 25 October 2
On Saturday 25 October 2008 21:53:00 Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 21:11 +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Le Saturday 25 October 2008 13:41:15 Ulrich Leodolter, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > For some
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 21:11 +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Saturday 25 October 2008 13:41:15 Ulrich Leodolter, vous avez écrit :
> > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch
> > > proced
Le Saturday 25 October 2008 13:41:15 Ulrich Leodolter, vous avez écrit :
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch
> > procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or
> > ours
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch
> procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or
> ourselves), we usually generate a patch, post it to the bug report, if any,
> and up
