* Kevin Keane schrieb am 23.03.09 um 20:36 Uhr:
> >
> >> I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not
> >> bat help files ;)
> >>
> >> It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current
> >> working directory which is not good ;)
> >>
> >> I would say /usr/share/d
John Drescher wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Marc Schiffbauer
> wrote:
>
>> I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not
>> bat help files ;)
>>
>> It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current
>> working directory which is not good ;)
>>
>> I w
On Monday 23 March 2009 17:54:21 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not
> bat help files ;)
>
> It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current
> working directory which is not good ;)
Yes, exactly. I didn't go into all the detail
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>
> I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not
> bat help files ;)
>
> It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current
> working directory which is not good ;)
>
> I would say /usr/share/doc/bat/
>
In
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 23.03.09 um 16:42 Uhr:
> Hello,
>
> It appears that the bat help files are not getting properly installed -- at
> least in version 2.5 (I never really thought about it in 2.4.x). Can anyone
> tell me what is the default location that applications such as Bacula are
>
I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not
bat help files ;)
It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current
working directory which is not good ;)
I would say /usr/share/doc/bat/
-Marc
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 23.03.09 um 16:42 Uhr:
> Hello,
>
> It appe
