On Tuesday 20 March 2007 00:49, Steen wrote:
> Mandag 19 marts 2007 19:34 skrev Kern Sibbald:
> > After receiving somewhat conflicting input (some pro quick releases, some
> > against), I've decided roughly to follow the following strategy:
> >
> > For the immediate future:
> > 1. Observe the progr
Mandag 19 marts 2007 19:34 skrev Kern Sibbald:
> After receiving somewhat conflicting input (some pro quick releases, some
> against), I've decided roughly to follow the following strategy:
>
> For the immediate future:
> 1. Observe the progress of our current development work over the next week
>
After receiving somewhat conflicting input (some pro quick releases, some
against), I've decided roughly to follow the following strategy:
For the immediate future:
1. Observe the progress of our current development work over the next week or
two.
2. As far as I can tell, all the code is stabl
On Sunday 18 March 2007 20:27, David Boyes wrote:
> > > I'm a fan of frequent releases. Smaller changes each time is a good
> > > thing. Both from a user and a sysadmin point of view.
>
> In principle this is a great idea. Can I suggest a minor variant?
>
> Frequent releases benefit sites that
> > I'm a fan of frequent releases. Smaller changes each time is a good
> > thing. Both from a user and a sysadmin point of view.
In principle this is a great idea. Can I suggest a minor variant?
Frequent releases benefit sites that are capable of experimentation.
Enterprise deployments don't
On Sunday 18 March 2007 18:22, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2007 at 16:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula
releases,
> > and would like your ideas.
> >
> > 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a coup
Hello,
Please don't hijack an email message. Your subject is titled "Bacula release
strategy", but the contents has nothing to do with that subject.
Concerning your question: I cannot answer your question because you have
supplied insufficient information, because the text you show for
disk_c
On 18 Mar 2007 at 16:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula releases,
> and would like your ideas.
>
> 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug fixes.
>
> 2. Release either version 2.0.5 or more like
Hi Kern and lists,
I discover problem with RunScript directive in version 2.0.2 and now in
2.0.3 too.
I have next directive in Job resource:
RunScript {
RunsWhen = After
RunsOnSuccess = yes
Command = "/etc/bacula/scripts/disk_check.sh %j"
}
and the script disk_check.sh is following:
siz
On Sunday 18 March 2007 17:28, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula
releases,
> > and would like your ideas.
> >
> > 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug
> > fixes.
> >
> > 2. Release either version
Hi,
> I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula releases,
> and would like your ideas.
>
> 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug
> fixes.
>
> 2. Release either version 2.0.5 or more likely version 2.2.0 within 4-8
> weeks, targeting 6 weeks
11 matches
Mail list logo
