On 2/14/07, Andreas Helmcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having an autochanger with 4 drives I found that the algorithm to find
> the drive to use for an job is somewhat "suboptimal":
> The storagedaemon always uses the first available drive without
> considering the loaded tape.
>
> This means: Wh
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Andreas Helmcke wrote:
> And worse:
> Today I had the problem, that the job which should run on drive 1 was
> held because of no available volume. So the drive was locked and the
> tape, which was needed for drive 0, was held in drive 1 blocking the job
> for drive 0.
This ha
Having an autochanger with 4 drives I found that the algorithm to find
the drive to use for an job is somewhat "suboptimal":
The storagedaemon always uses the first available drive without
considering the loaded tape.
This means: When I did a backup using concurrent jobs to use more then
one drive
