On Tuesday 25 April 2006 16:52, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/19):
> > > --- src/dird/ua_label.c.orig Thu Jan 19 10:05:21 2006
> > > +++ src/dird/ua_label.c Thu Jan 19 10:07:50 2006
> > > @@ -305,7 +305,9 @@
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (!relabel && (i=find_arg_keyword(
Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/19):
> > --- src/dird/ua_label.c.origThu Jan 19 10:05:21 2006
> > +++ src/dird/ua_label.c Thu Jan 19 10:07:50 2006
> > @@ -305,7 +305,9 @@
> > }
> >
> > if (!relabel && (i=find_arg_keyword(ua, barcode_keyword)) >= 0) {
> > - *ua->argk[i] = 0;
On 8 Mar 2006 at 10:11, Gregory Orange wrote:
> Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just added some tapes to my autochanger. If I do a "label barcodes"
> > command, will it re-label the existing tapes too, or only label the new
> > tapes? The documentation isn't clear on that topic.
> >
> >
Chris Wilson wrote:
Hi,
I just added some tapes to my autochanger. If I do a "label barcodes"
command, will it re-label the existing tapes too, or only label the new
tapes? The documentation isn't clear on that topic.
Figured I'd ask before I inadvertently wipe out the existing tapes...
It
Hi,
I just added some tapes to my autochanger. If I do a "label barcodes"
command, will it re-label the existing tapes too, or only label the new
tapes? The documentation isn't clear on that topic.
Figured I'd ask before I inadvertently wipe out the existing tapes...
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Wils
On Thursday 19 January 2006 10:27, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/18):
> > > > I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too:
> > > > Unfortunately they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first
> > > > argument is discarded. As a workaround, you can use
> > > > la
Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/18):
> > > I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too: Unfortunately
> > > they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first argument is discarded.
> > > As a workaround, you can use
> > > label ANYTHING slots=NNN storage=SSS pool=PPP barcodes
> > > for no
Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/18):
> I am unable to reproduce this on version 1.38.4, so if someone submits it to
> the bugs database, be sure to include "proof" that there is a bug. You might
> want to include output with the Director's debug level set to 400.
Ok, when my bacula server is idle,
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:02, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/18/2006 10:42 AM, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
> > Rudolf Cejka wrote (2006/01/18):
> >>I wanted to test Bacula-1.38.3 and/or Bacula-1.38.4, however
> >>I haven't sufficient time yet.
> >
> > I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacul
Hello,
On 1/18/2006 10:42 AM, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
Rudolf Cejka wrote (2006/01/18):
I wanted to test Bacula-1.38.3 and/or Bacula-1.38.4, however
I haven't sufficient time yet.
I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too: Unfortunately
they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the
Rudolf Cejka wrote (2006/01/18):
> I wanted to test Bacula-1.38.3 and/or Bacula-1.38.4, however
> I haven't sufficient time yet.
I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too: Unfortunately
they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first argument is discarded.
As a workaround, you ca
Evan Kaufman wrote (2006/01/17):
> Is the long syntax of the 'label barcodes' console command fully
> functional?
Hello, interesting - I had exactly the same problem as you yesterday too :o)
It seems, that label [storage=xxx] [pool=yyy] [slots=1-10] barcodes is
broken in Bacula-1.38.2, but in Bacu
Is the long syntax of the 'label barcodes' console command fully
functional? In other words, can I specify the slots i want labeled,
in which storage resource, & in which pool, all from a one-line
command?
>From what i could understand from the manual, it should be something
similar to this:
labe
13 matches
Mail list logo
