> According to
> http://www.baculasystems.com/windows-binaries-for-bacula-community-users,
> 6.0.6 is still the latest version. Does this mean the bug was never
> fixed there, or is it the text on that page that needs updating? Or
> is there still something else entirely, and is it not this bug tha
eeds updating?
Or is there still something else entirely, and is it not this bug that's
hitting me?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Lohman [mailto:thom...@mtl.mit.edu]
Sent: 07 July 2014 20:12
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] "Socket te
> Because traffic is going through those firewalls, I had already
> configured keepalive packets (heartbeat) at 300 seconds. In my first
> tests, backups *did* fail because that was missing. Now they don't
> seem to fail anymore, but there's that "socket terminated" message
> every now and then t
Sorry for the subject line, forgot to replace it by something more descriptive
:(
-Original Message-
From: Luc Van der Veken [mailto:luc...@wimionline.com]
Sent: 07 July 2014 8:54
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] FW: Bacula: Backup OK of sphad01-fd Differen
