On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:31, Ekkehard Burkon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >
> > Two things:
> >
> > 1. Something seems wrong (possibly with your configuration). By default
> > Bacula writes blocks of 64,512 bytes and not 65536 as indicated above on
the
> > error message. Th
Hi,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> Two things:
>
> 1. Something seems wrong (possibly with your configuration). By default
> Bacula writes blocks of 64,512 bytes and not 65536 as indicated above on the
> error message. This makes me wonder. In any case, I don't recommend that
> you change the de
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:39:21 +0100, Ekkehard Burkon said:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a backup server up and running with debian sarge as
> base system and approx 2TB of disk storage on a raid 5 array on a
> 3ware 9000 controller.
>
> The backups seem to be OK. But each restore fails wi
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:39, Ekkehard Burkon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a backup server up and running with debian sarge as
> base system and approx 2TB of disk storage on a raid 5 array on a
> 3ware 9000 controller.
>
> The backups seem to be OK. But each restore fails with something
Hi,
I'm trying to get a backup server up and running with debian sarge as
base system and approx 2TB of disk storage on a raid 5 array on a
3ware 9000 controller.
The backups seem to be OK. But each restore fails with something
like:
20-Mär 15:08 backup-sd: RestoreFiles.2007-03-20_15.04.19 Erro
Hello,
I've recently ported a working bacula-1.36.3 configuration from Fedora
Core 2 (i386) on a 1.6TB "File" storage setup, onto the same server
hardware running a fresh copy of Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS with a new 6.4TB disk
array.
Bacula is backed on PostgreSQL 8.1.4 (from Ubuntu repos). Backups are
