i'm going through a similar issue -- zurich, barca, copenhagen ...
mayak-cq, can you test bacula performance under your conditions? With and
without ssh (or something similar) tunnel.
+--
|This was sent by rea...@lmn.name via Ba
if i understand you correctly, bacula is only using a 128k -- way too small?
curious -- have you played with "Maximum Network Buffer Size" ? does this help?
Yes, that's correct, bacula can only scale window to 128k that's why throughput
gets limited to 10Mbit/s. With ssh tunnel between client an
i have noticed that scp is not a good measure of throughput -- i do not know
why. i use an openvpn tunnel between sites and loose about 20% of throughput
due to the tunnel. check window size on distant machine (using wireshark) to
verify that some upstream device is not changing it.
No, no, no.
sounds like your sysctl.conf needs tweaking? have you tried something like this
on both sides?
kernel.msgmnb = 65536
kernel.msgmax = 65536
kernel.shmmax = 68719476736
kernel.shmall = 4294967296
# long fat pipes
net.core.wmem_max = 8388608
net.core.rmem_max = 8388608
Yes, I tried t
Hello.
I saw this post recently
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg47393.html
and it seems I'm affected by this problem too. Bacula shows extremely low
performance in networks with high rtt. I have sd in Germany and client in USA.
Bacula can make backups on speed
