UTC Time: February 19, 2016 10:02 PM
From: a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk
To: paul.hutchi...@protonmail.com
CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
On 19/02/16 19:10, paul.hutchings wrote:
Alan thanks, I omitted that we have a Spectra LTO6 library which would be SAS
attached to the server in question b
2 AM, paul.hutchings
wrote:
For example if I were to suggest box with dual 8 core E5 CPUs, hardware PERC
RAID card with 1GB cache, 48TB of 7.2k SATA in RAID6 and 32GB (or more) of RAM
running as a SD
I actually use a Raspberry Pi with attached USB disks as an SD. I have about a
dozen cli
is
is dumb/obvious to most of you :)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Hardware Specs & Sizing for Bacula?
Local Time: February 19, 2016 6:58 pm
UTC Time: February 19, 2016 6:58 PM
From: a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk
To: paul.hutchi...@protonmail.com,bacula-users@lists.sourcefor
We're new to Bacula and are still considering if it's viable for us.
Our test environment is quite small (it is a test environment) and when I read
the docs I'm not sure how recent they are when they relate to hardware specs.
For example if I were to suggest box with dual 8 core E5 CPUs, hardwar
I'm still new to Bacula and I'm doing some testing of Windows performance.
If I have a client which I know has a good disk subsystem and which has good
ethernet connectivity to the director/storage director, and a mixture of file
types ranging from folders containing a few huge files through to
Hi, hoping I can ask for some fairly generic and possibly specific feedback
here please.
We currently us a very well regarded commercial product to backup our
environment. Good product but licensing is prohibitive.
Our environment is pretty simple I think.
We have some VMware boxes running 5.5
