Re: [Bacula-users] Very slow backups

2005-11-06 Thread Uwe Hees
Hello, I have had performance issues with version 1.36 and 1.37.x too. Setting the FD's "Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536" (instead of the default 32k) gave a dramatic speed improvement. Though I don't know if the default has changed for 1.38. It might be worth trying. Greetings, Uwe

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula performance

2005-09-02 Thread Uwe Hees
Hello all, I finally found a solution to speed up the performance dramatically: In the FileDaemon resource I set "Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536" (instead of the default 32k). Now I get ~3MB/sec, which is reasonable. Thanks for all assistance, Uwe Am 31.08.2005 um 18:28 s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula performance solved!

2005-09-02 Thread Uwe Hees
Hello all, I finally found a solution to speed up the performance dramatically: In the FileDaemon resource I set "Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536" (instead of the default 32k). Now I get ~3MB/sec, which is reasonable. Thanks for all assistance,# Uwe Am 31.08.2005 um 18:28 s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula performance

2005-08-31 Thread Uwe Hees
Hello,Am 30.08.2005 um 18:15 schrieb Kern Sibbald:Perhaps you didn't read the ReleaseNotes where I indicate that SQLite3 in my tests was 4 to 10 times slower than SQLite 2.  Try SQLite 2 or MySQL.I used sqlite3 mainly because it came preinstalled with MacOS 10.4. Meanwhile I have installed MySQL fo

[Bacula-users] Bacula performance

2005-08-30 Thread Uwe Hees
Hello all, for some time I am playing with bacula to find out if should use it for personal backups at home and maybe use it in the my company to backup some Linux servers. I have tried 1.36 and some 1.37 up to 1.37.37 on my ibook G4 running under MacOS X 10.4.2. While performing the de