[Bacula-users] copy-job failed on big jobs (other backups use the source jukebox during volume change)

2014-07-30 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi, I try to use copy-jobs with an neo200s (2 drives,with logical partition: 2 jukeboxes with one drive each). Bacula is version 5.2.10. If I run an copyjob with 4.8 TB the job fails during volume-change on the normal (source) backup-jukebox. Both jobs failed at the same time (2:00): ### c

Re: [Bacula-users] No other backup-jobs during copyjob

2014-07-01 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi, even if I start thereafter jobs with prio 14 or 9 the status say: Running Jobs: Console connected at 01-Jul-14 13:49 Console connected at 01-Jul-14 13:55 JobId Level Name Status == 2236 FullCopy-

[Bacula-users] No other backup-jobs during copyjob

2014-07-01 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi all, I try to use copy jobs to copy the last fullbackup from tape to another tape (different pool). Work so far, but during an running copy job the normal backup jobs don't start. And this is an problem, because some fullbackups are very big (up to 8TB) and takes days not hours. The normal back

[Bacula-users] Changed storage-name in 5.2.1 - error during restore

2011-11-22 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi, last friday i updated our backup-server from bacula 5.0.3 (mysql) to bacula 5.2.1 (postgresql). During the update i change the jukebox (Neo2000E): before the jukebox was partitioned and used from two nodes (both via bacula-sd), after the update bacula use the whole jukebox from one node. Re

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance speedup for LTO-4 (only 70MB/s reached)?

2010-09-17 Thread Udo Lembke
is a little bit better (up to 77MB/s) but that's not enough. The problem ist not the 32bit architecture... Any ideas? Udo Am 17.09.2010 16:14, schrieb John Drescher: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Udo Lembke > wrote: > >> Hi, >> i need some tips for a backup-

[Bacula-users] Performance speedup for LTO-4 (only 70MB/s reached)?

2010-09-17 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi, i need some tips for a backup-server. On a new backup-server i reach a backup-speed to an LTO-4 drive of 70MB/s only. Here the config: bacula 5.0.3 self compiled on debian squeeze 32bit OpenVZ-vm (Proxmox as virtualisation platform). neo200s jukebox (1 lto-4 SAS-drive) connected via a LSI SA

[Bacula-users] recover (building directory tree) extreme slow after update from 3.0.2 to 5.0.2 [solved]

2010-07-09 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi, i'm very happy with bacula - but my yesterday update from 3.0.2 to 5.0.2 makes me some headache. Backup runs - but to restore a job bring the mysql-server to hang (ok, the server work's but without result for over an hour). With 3.0.2 it takes seconds (less than one minute) to build the dir

Re: [Bacula-users] Missing emails after upgrade to 5.0.2

2010-07-09 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi, if you switch to the backup-user (bacula?), perhaps you will be unable to send mail because the rights of libbac-5.0.1.so are to strong: bac...@backup-srv: $ /usr/sbin/bsmtp -h mailgate.domain.de -f bac...@domain.de -s "testmail von bsmtp" bac...@domain.de /usr/sbin/bsmtp: error while loading