hat you have some serious problem somewhere, but I don't know
> where. I leave it to you to do the research and let us know.
>
>
>
> On Monday 08 August 2005 13:26, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>
>>>To a
Hi all,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> To answer your question, you will need to do some timing. See below.
>
> On Monday 08 August 2005 09:37, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
>
>>Hi, sorry for the late reply, weekend.
>>
>>I did the test again like you did it (with the time c
George R. Kasica wrote:
> Phil:
>
> Totally new questionI'm at the point of doing the various tape
> labels to build my pools here but was wondering how I do the
> following:
>
> Each cartridge has 1 cleaning tape in it and I want to let bacula know
> either:
>
> 1) Ideally this is a cleanin
and
>> the database is running on an Athlon 2400 with only
>> 256 MB of memory and it takes (1 to 3) minutes to get
>> the file list for around 10,000 files with version
>> 1.36.3 and a postgresql database. The hard drive light
>> on machine with the database is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I
>>decided to test a full server recovery.
>>I discovered that the building the directory tree
>>takes a very long time (almost an hour) for 429,836
>>files.
>>I started the building of the tree at 11:20 and at
>
Hi,
I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I decided to test a full server
recovery.
I discovered that the building the directory tree takes a very long time
(almost an hour) for 429,836 files.
I started the building of the tree at 11:20 and at 12:15 I got a prompt.
The machine is a d
