docs on the Scratch pool)
O.K., that really helps a lot, because with all this 'complex
scheduling' I was not sure at all, if there is some sort of tape order
at all...
Thanks again for all your help!
Ralf
John Drescher schrieb:
> On 7/31/07, Ralf Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I do not believe the DB has this information as this is handled by the
> scheduler while bacula is running. Although it may be possible for you
> to query the list of jobs to be run then try to figure out what tape
> would be needed.
But the scheduler has to get his info from somewhere or somebo
tape belong to the pool forever
and be named 07a or something? And what happens next month, if 07 is
sufficient again, will bacula write to 07a or to 08?
I am afraid I have not fully understood bacula's tape handling yet ...
This is also the reason for my uncertainity concernin
n files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Ralf Auer
Hello Frank,
obviously I found an expert... Thanks for your reply.
The reason why I decided to have so many different pools was motivated
by the (confusing) examples in the manual, so I DID read it, even more
than twice ;-)
My problem is, that I have to write to both tapes simultaneously
Hello everybody,
I need a little help from someone more experienced with Bacula than I
am.
My cluster consists of ~40 clients, the total amount of data that has to
be backed up is around 6 TB. To accomplish this I have two HP Ultrium
960 (400/800GB) and a sufficient number of tapes.
I a
