On 27/01/2025 15:41, Udo Kaune wrote:
Please try
https://www.ibm.com/search?lang=en&cc=us&facetTabs=fixes&origin=fc&q=ITDT&tabType[0]=support
I've tested the drive with ITDT and it passes health check and reports
similar speeds.
On the first pass the System Test achieves around 30MB/sec. On
Hi all,
This isn't specifically a Bacula question but I know a bunch of you are
running LTO drives and I hope you'll grant me the wisdom of your experience!
I'm seeing an unusual (to me) issue with a new-old-stock IBM drive and
tapes. They came as a package deal. The drive has about 600 power
On 10/01/2022 20:52, Josh Fisher wrote:
That drive only has an 80 TBW endurance. For LTO 6 with compression,
that's maybe 20 full tapes written. It won't last long as a cache drive.
Indeed it didn't ... it lasted three months!
To be fair I wasn't intending to use it long term -- it was a cheap
Hi all,
I'm using Bacula to back up a pair of servers (my firewall and NAS),
backing up to an LTO6 drive. This requires a sustained data rate of
around 150MB/sec with on-drive compression disabled, or more with
compression.
I previously used a spinning SATA hard drive, which peaked at around
On 20/12/2020 12:38, Josh Fisher wrote:
> It is not likely a network issue. 'A' does not have a strong processor.
> When compression is enabled for a job, it is the client that performs
> the compression. Likewise for data encryption. Try disabling both
> compression and encryption for the 'A' job,
Hi all,
I'm trying to improve the performance of my Bacula backups. I have a
configuration with two machines:
- "A" - a small server running a few web services.
(Intel Celeron J1800 2.4GHz dual-core)
- "B" - a 9TB NAS with a Quantum Superloader LTO-6 SAS tape robot
(Intel Q6600 3GHz quad-cor
