Re: [Bacula-users] 0 files restored from bacula backup

2015-01-24 Thread Peter van Heusden
these steps changed the outcome of my restore. Peter On 14 January 2015 at 17:29, Peter van Heusden wrote: > No, about 900 files were marked, as can be seen in the files expected > line. I did this by marking a directory, which, as I understand it, > recursively marks everything under

Re: [Bacula-users] 0 files restored from bacula backup

2015-01-14 Thread Peter van Heusden
No, about 900 files were marked, as can be seen in the files expected line. I did this by marking a directory, which, as I understand it, recursively marks everything under that directory. Peter On Jan 14, 2015 3:59 PM, "John Drescher" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Pete

[Bacula-users] 0 files restored from bacula backup

2015-01-14 Thread Peter van Heusden
Hi there I did a backup of one of our servers in early December 2014. The backup was written to a LTO3 tape on the IBM TS3200 tape changer that we have. The backup server is running bacula 5.0.0 and the client is bacula 2.2.8. I did a test restore soon after the backup completed and successfully

[Bacula-users] Packet size too big

2006-05-19 Thread Peter van Heusden
I'm seeing what seems to be a similar error message to what Dominic Marks reported earlier this month. Director is running on a SGI Irix machine (Irix 6.5.3), bacula version 1.38.6. File daemon is running on a FreeBSD 5 machine, Bacula 1.38.9. Here is the error output: 19-May 16:34 ziggy-dir: