On Sep 7, 2014, at 5:42 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 07:33 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>> I'm interested in perhaps deploying this in my k-8 school, but I have not
>> found a good tutorial of how to install it. Or if it even works right on Mac.
>>
>> Anyone have some insights on this?
On May 3, 2013, at 12:03 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Francisco Garcia Perez :
>
>> Hello,
>> I have a PowerVault 124T, but I want buy a new backup system with support
>> for my old LTO-2 and LTO-3 tapes with at least 24 slots, 2 drives, a
>> barcode scanner. What do you recommen
On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> On 03/26/13 22:33, Wood Peter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm planning to use Bacula to do file level backup of about 15 Linux
>> systems. Total backup size is about 2TB.
>>
>> For Bacula server I'm thinking to buy Dell PE R520 with 24TB internal
>>
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 2013-03-04 04:42, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 08:45:05 +0100
>> Geert Stappers wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>> Thank you for the tip. I want to share another.
>>> It is about canceling multiple jobs. Execute from shell
>>>
>>>
On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:58:33 -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
>> On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>>> On the flip side, compression seems to be a very big win. I'm
>>> seeing ratios from 1.7 to 2
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Mark wrote:
>> Steven, out of curiosity, do you see any benefit with dedup (assuming that
>> bacula volumes are the only thing on a given zfs volume). I did some
>> initial trials and it appeared that bacula
On Aug 4, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Why do we use volumes? It sounds like a silly question, but it's
>> genuine. Is it so a backup can span several media types? Tape, file,
>> disk, Pandora's box, what? Why do I care about volumes and how long
>> they're retained, how often
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Ken Mandelberg wrote:
> Under Legato the license restriction artificially keep the "file-device"
> small relative to the tape storage. However, these days disks are
> cheaper than tapes and license free we could afford a lot of disk space.
I know hard drives are che
On Jul 7, 2011, at 12:30 PM, James Woodward wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I haven't seen anything about using nsa devices to use over something like an
> sa device. I did a bit of a search but haven't seen anything that really
> explains that portion to me.
The FreeBSD tape driver uses different device
On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:30:36 -0600, James Woodward said:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I haven't seen anything about using nsa devices to use over something like
>> an sa device. I did a bit of a search but haven't seen anything that really
>> explain
On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On Thu, January 20, 2011 12:28 pm, Silver Salonen wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 January 2011 19:02:33 Paul Mather wrote:
>>> On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:01 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> This is
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:01 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>>> This is normal. If you want fast compression do not use software
>>> compression and use a tape drive with HW compression like LTO drives.
>>>
>>> John
>> Not really an option for file/disk devices though.
>>
>> I've been tempted to experime
On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Lawrence Strydom wrote:
> I understand that something is adding data and logically the backup should
> grow. What I don't understand is why the entire file has to be backed up if
> only a few bytes of data has changed. It is mainly outlook.pst files and
> MSSQL data
On Aug 30, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> Like most ZFS related stuff it all sounds (and looks) extremely easy but
> in reality it is not quite so simple.
Yes, but does ZFS makes things easier or harder?
Silent data corruption won't go away just because your pool is large. :-)
(But,
On Aug 28, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Steve Costaras wrote:
> Could be due to a transient error (transmission or wild/torn read at time of
> calculation). I see this a lot with integrity checking of files here (50TiB
> of storage).
>
> Only way to get around this now is to do a known-good sha1/md5 has
On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> You:
>> On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
>>> IMHO there are two problems with hardware compression:
>>> 1. Data mix: The compression algorithms tend to work quite well on
>>> compressable stuff, but can't cope very well with prec
On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> IMHO there are two problems with hardware compression:
> 1. Data mix: The compression algorithms tend to work quite well on
> compressable stuff, but can't cope very well with precompressed stuff, i.e.
> encrypted data or media files. On an old
On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Henry Yen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:48:10AM +0200, Christian Gaul wrote:
>> Even when catting to /dev/dsp i use /dev/urandom.. Blocking on
>> /dev/random happens much too quickly.. and when do you really need that
>> much randomness.
>
> I get about 40 bytes
On Aug 6, 2010, at 4:48 AM, Christian Gaul wrote:
> Am 05.08.2010 21:56, schrieb Henry Yen:
>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 17:17:39PM +0200, Christian Gaul wrote:
>>
[[...]]
>>
/dev/urandom seems to measure about 3MB/sec or thereabouts, so creating
a large "uncompressible" file could be do
On Jul 20, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7/20/2010 12:20 PM, Paul Mather wrote:
>> I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE (RELENG_8). Recently, the
>> sysutils/bacula-{client,server} ports were updated to 5.0.2. Unfortunately,
>> when updating via portmast
I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE (RELENG_8). Recently, the
sysutils/bacula-{client,server} ports were updated to 5.0.2. Unfortunately,
when updating via portmaster, the bacula-client port updated successfully, but
bacula-server did not. It fails to build:
[[...]]
Compiling ua_restore.c
Com
On Jun 30, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Albin Vega wrote:
> Hello
>
> First let me say that I havent been using FreeBSD and Bacula before, so its
> all a bit new to me, and I might do some beginners mistakes.
>
> have installed Bacula server 5.0.0.1 on a FreeBsd 8 platform. Have followed
> the instruc
On Jun 21, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Cato Myhrhagen wrote:
> I have som problems getting Bacula-Bat working. Here is what i have done so
> far:
>
> 1. Installed FreeBSD 8.0 rel
> 2. From the ports catalogue i have installed Gnome Lite
> 3. Uppgraded all the ports with CVsup
> 4. Then I installed Bacula
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:24 AM, Cato Myhrhagen wrote:
> Hello
>
> First let me say that i am new to FreeBSD and Bacula, so my question might be
> a bit trivial. Newertheless, I am having big problems installing Bacula BAT
> on my FreeBSD server. Let me explain what i have done so far:
>
> 1. In
About three months ago I began using Bacula (5.0.0 on FreeBSD 8-STABLE),
initially backing up to disk, but with a view to backing up to tape in the near
future. To keep things simple, I initially used Sqlite for the catalogue.
About a week ago, I decided to move to using PostgreSQL for the cat
Does anyone have a working script to migrate a Sqlite3 catalogue database to
PostgreSQL 8.4.4?
I'm using a very recent FreeBSD 8-STABLE and the sqlite2pgsql script in the
examples/database directory of the source code doesn't work for me. Has anyone
got this to work successfully under a curren
On May 18, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 15:08 -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
>> I am currently assembling a quote for an LTO-4 tape backup system. So far,
>> I am looking at using a 16-slot Quantum SuperLoader 3 with LTO-4HH drive as
>> the t
I am currently assembling a quote for an LTO-4 tape backup system. So far, I
am looking at using a 16-slot Quantum SuperLoader 3 with LTO-4HH drive as the
tape unit. Married to this will be a server to act as the backup server that
will drive the tape unit using Bacula to manage backups. The
28 matches
Mail list logo
