Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:18, Patrick Van der Veken wrote:
>
>> Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>
>>> Are your JOBS set to expire soon enough to recycle the tape? There are
>>> per-job retention periods to contend with.
>>>
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:35, Patrick Van der Veken wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:34, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Wanted to chime in here because after a long period of time spent
tinkering with
,
File, Volume) into account? In our case, job retention is a year.
Regards,
--
Patrick Van der Veken
Qtris BV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web
et)
3. Check tape (still in status 'Used')
4. Generate mount request.
5. Confirm manually the mount request (with the same tape and just seconds
later than the mount request!)
6. Backup starts on the same tape.
My err for calling this a "pruning bug". More likely a "volume
sr/sbin/bacula-console -f /etc/bacula/bconsole.conf
>
> from a script...
>
> Regards,
> Mosu
>
Hi Mosu,
Pruning the volume manually beforehand would be cumbersome solution. How
do you determine the volume name which needs to be pruned (the $1
variable)?
Regards,
--
Patrick Van de
ll previous data lost.
And then bacula recycles the tape and starts the backup! This does not
make any sense whatsoever???
Regards,
--
Patrick Van der Veken
Qtris BV
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
ust do not
understand why the *automatic* pruning did not work. It is a big
showstopper for unattended backups :/
Regards,
--
Patrick Van der Veken
Qtris BV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting lan
nt" command.
Q: why didn't Bacula automatically prune the volume data even though
AutoPrune, Recyle and 'Recycle Current Volume', 'Accept Any Volume' are
all set?
Regards,
--
Patrick Van der Veken
Qtris BV
---
T
