Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Where do we go after Bacula 2.2.0?

2007-09-11 Thread Nick Pope
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:26 PM, David Boyes wrote: > >> Couldn't the migrate capability be altered ever so slightly to allow >> the "migration" of a job without purging the old job from the >> catalog? This would allow bitwise identical backup(s) to be created >> without having to create a forking/

Re: [Bacula-users] Feature Request Copy Job

2007-09-11 Thread Nick Pope
Migration deletes the old job (equivalent to a move). What he (and others) wants is a copy (retain old job). -Nick On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:41 AM, Eric Böse-Wolf wrote: > What about migration? See the Bacula manual. > > mfg > > Eric > -- > Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimn

Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger mount/unmount problem

2007-09-05 Thread Nick Pope
On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:26 PM, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 05.09.2007 22:30,, Bob Hetzel wrote:: >> I've been having this trouble for a while. It was just posted on the >> list to add autochanger=yes into a spot in the bacula-dir.conf >> file and >> that solved one problem I had unmounting/mount

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Where do we go after Bacula 2.2.0?

2007-08-21 Thread Nick Pope
On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Nick Pope wrote: > >> >> On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:48 PM, David Boyes wrote: >> >>>> I would like to second this. Right now I have duplicates of >>>> everything >>&

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Where do we go after Bacula 2.2.0?

2007-08-21 Thread Nick Pope
On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:48 PM, David Boyes wrote: >> I would like to second this. Right now I have duplicates of >> everything >> to first do a local backup and 7 hours later another backup of the > same >> data (but without the scripts and longer runtime) to an offsite > storage >> to mirror th