During Bacula clean installation, upon tables creation, I get the following
notices from PostgreSQL.
Since Bacula will be installed on a production system, and PostgreSQL is
prefered over MySQL, I would like to
ask if these notices are considered "safe".
The server is running on CentOS 6.4, Bacu
I have successfully implemented TLS communication between
director-storage-clients.
Is there a way to verify that indeed all the traffic is encrypted?
I tried "openssl s_client -connect director:port" and it claims that the
connection is not encrypted.
Also I cannot capture any encrypted communica
wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Nasos Nikologiannis wrote:
>
> > I have a Bacula test setup running in order to decide about volume
> rotation before migrating to production.
> >
> > The setup includes multi pools with volume rotation, one pool per client
> pe
I have a Bacula test setup running in order to decide about volume rotation
before migrating to production.
The setup includes multi pools with volume rotation, one pool per client
per backup type (full, differential, incremental).
I observed that although I change the Volume Retention period to
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:50:37PM +0200, Nasos Nikologiannis wrote:
> > I am planning an enterprise-level network backup solution with the
> > following requirements/restrictions:
> >
> > -Local and remot
I am planning an enterprise-level network backup solution with the
following requirements/restrictions:
-Local and remote servers with heterogenous operating systems
(Linux,Windows)
-Backup policy that dictates backup data availability monthly for a year
cycle, weekly for a month cycle and daily f