Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:34:57 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 14 October 2009 17:38:59 +0100,
>> Martin Simmons wrote:
>> # DGB - 20091012
>> # Starting bacula-fd on boot
>> if [ -x /etc/bacula/scripts/bacula-ctl-fd ]; then
>> /etc/bacula/scripts/
On both Suse 9 and CentOS 4.6, I ran into a problem building client-only
rpms with these command lines:
sudo rpmbuild --ba --define "build_client_only 1" --define "build_su9 1"
bacula.spec
sudo rpmbuild --ba --define "build_client_only 1" --define "build_centos4 1"
bacula.spec
The error is a mis
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:30:47AM -0500, Mike Erdely wrote:
> If there are any OpenBSD users out there using bacula, it'd be nice if I
> could get some more testing/feedback for Bacula 2.2.8 on OpenBSD
> -current.
>
> To help:
> - Upgrade to -current (using snapshots)
Hi,
If there are any OpenBSD users out there using bacula, it'd be nice if I
could get some more testing/feedback for Bacula 2.2.8 on OpenBSD
-current.
To help:
- Upgrade to -current (using snapshots)
- Checkout the ports tree
- Apply the diff below in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula
- Test
Feedb
Hi,
I wanted to announce that OpenBSD has imported Bacula 2.0.3 into its
ports tree for OpenBSD 4.2. If you're running OpenBSD -current, you can
and should test the Bacula port and give any feedback to either
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MAINTAINER) so we can make
sure that the por
