Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 1.38 on Redhat Advanced Server 2.1 or 3

2005-11-22 Thread Michele Baldessari
* Beren Gamble ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone got Bacula 1.38 working on Redhat Advanced Server 2.1 or 3? > > It complains to me about not having a late enough version of glibc. > > On 2.1 I tried to compile the latest version of glibc, but it says I need a= > newer version of

Re: [Bacula-users] [FAQ addition] Bacula, kernel 2.6.x and SCSI hangs when tape drive is empty

2005-11-14 Thread Michele Baldessari
* Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Friday 28 October 2005 12:00, Michele Baldessari wrote: > > Since I've spent some time looking at bacula's and mt's source code to > > figure out why just bacula was barfing on an empty tape drive on a > > 2.6.x lin

[Bacula-users] [FAQ addition] Bacula, kernel 2.6.x and SCSI hangs when tape drive is empty

2005-10-28 Thread Michele Baldessari
look but found nothing relevant). Note: I stumbled upon this issue while configuring bacula 1.36.2 on a 2.6.x based system on an IBM 4560SLX tape library. thanks for all your work, Michele Baldessari * Bacula, kernel 2.6.x and SCSI hangs when tape drive is empty Bacula 1.36.x does not open

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in SCO Unix y Slackware

2005-09-27 Thread Michele Baldessari
* Jesús Pérez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > can I install bacula with SCO Unix and Slackware system ? Recompiling bacula on SCO is fairly trivial and should work ok (had to tweak a couple of linking flags. no details since I've done it more than a year ago, but it's nonetheless quite straightforwar