Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

2005-05-18 Thread Matthew Hawkins
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, everyone is entitled to his opinion. And thanks to the internet, we can all express it ;) > In my case, it is not that I cannot be bothered to subscribe as you seem > suggest. This should be obvious from the amount of time and effort I put into

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

2005-05-18 Thread Matthew Hawkins
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't want > to > subscribe to lists even to get help If you got software for free, and you can't even be bothered to do something as simple as subscribe to a free mailing list to receive f

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore question

2005-05-05 Thread Matthew Hawkins
Russell Howe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Marcin Wasilewski wrote: > > I am running Bacula on 1.36.2 Debian with MySQL and it is working fine. [snip] > > What should I do to restore those files I need and do not damage anything. > > I think bscan is the tool you're looking for. In the Debian pack

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did the files go?

2005-04-22 Thread Matthew Hawkins
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Most likely the jobs were pruned of their File table entries by your File > retention policy, but the job records remain. Hopefully a future version will > more explicitly warn of this. You will most likely need to bscan the > volume(s) for those jobs.

[Bacula-users] Where did the files go?

2005-04-13 Thread Matthew Hawkins
I'm attempting a restore for a user who stored files on a server he shouldn't have which subsequently suffered MASSIVE FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION Er, anyhow I have this minor problem: [... snip ...] You have selected the following JobIds: 3152,3243,3256,3269,3281,3293,3305,3317 Building directory tre