Re: [Bacula-users] SQLite

2015-04-30 Thread Matt Ivie
-Original Message- From: Dimitri Maziuk To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] SQLite Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:12:53 -0500 Mailer: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 On 2015-04-29 08:58, Matt Ivie wrote: >

Re: [Bacula-users] SQLite

2015-04-30 Thread Matt Ivie
, 2015 08:58:40 AM Matt Ivie wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Matt Ivie > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Bacula-users] SQLite > Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:17:11 -0600 > Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6+6.0trisquel1 > > I saw a note in

Re: [Bacula-users] SQLite

2015-04-29 Thread Matt Ivie
-Original Message- From: Matt Ivie To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Bacula-users] SQLite Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:17:11 -0600 Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6+6.0trisquel1 I saw a note in the Bacula documentation stating that some users were reporting database

[Bacula-users] SQLite

2015-04-27 Thread Matt Ivie
I saw a note in the Bacula documentation stating that some users were reporting database corruption problems when using SQLite. I also saw a thread on the mailing list from a couple of years ago where one user wanted to know if he would be better off using Postgresql One user stated he had great l