[Bacula-users] will "delete volume" delete associated jobs?

2013-09-11 Thread Mapper ict department
Hello, I have the following question: will "delete volume" delete associated jobs? I ask this because off how the following message is constructed (especially what i have put between arrows). This command will delete volume XO7561L3 and all Jobs saved -> on that volume <- from the Catalog The

Re: [Bacula-users] level: Since?

2009-08-25 Thread Mapper ict department
r mentions something like: this level is not supported. It would be nice though if it were possible. Does somebody has this working already? With kind regards, Tony >>> "Mapper ict department" 20-8-2009 19:12 >>> Hello, Can anyone tell me what the Since level is

[Bacula-users] level: Since?

2009-08-20 Thread Mapper ict department
Hello, Can anyone tell me what the Since level is for? I get there by: - typing run - choosing a job - typing mod - selecting 1: level With kind regards, Tony -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crysta

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-08-04 Thread Mapper ict department
Well... the problem is discovered... I don't even dare to say what it was... :( With kind regards, Tony -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report des

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-08-03 Thread Mapper ict department
499L3" Bytes=782,641,004,544 Blocks=12,131,711 at 15-Jul-2009 01:00. (tape get's changed) I will post the results of the the test with tar as soon as possible. Thanks, Tony >>> John Drescher 30-7-2009 14:28 >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, John Drescher wro

[Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-30 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Bacula version: (26 July 2008) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian 4.0 backup unit/changer: HP storageworks MSL2024 LTO3 Hello, We have a real weird problem. Tapes are not fully written. But this is not in all cases. The problem seems to concentrate around our monthly backups. When the tapes are labelled

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-22 Thread Mapper ict department
Correction. The same occurs also during weekly backup now. Also with tapes labeled which were put directly into the weekly pool. We haven't noticed that before since only additional month tapes are normally added since we've already had labelled all weekly tapes we needed and have been recycling

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-21 Thread Mapper ict department
I went through all the logs and found no errors involving scsi except for this. I only found this once so i guess it's not not a biggy. Jun 19 14:16:05 fileserver kernel: scsi 0:0:3:0: rejecting I/O to dead device Jun 19 14:16:05 fileserver kernel: scsi 0:0:3:0: rejecting I/O to dead device Jun

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-20 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Sorry, i forgot that one. Here is the list media from the monthly pool: As you can see in the beginning it worked better then now. | MediaId|VolumeName|VolStatus|Enabled|VolBytes | VolFiles|VolRetention| Recycle| Slot |InChanger| MediaType| LastWritten | +-++

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-20 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Thank you for your response John, Here is the contents of the config files: [bacula-dir.conf] # # Default Bacula Director Configuration file # # The only thing that MUST be changed is to add one or more # file or directory names in the Include directive of the # FileSet resource. # # For

[Bacula-users] tapes not fully written

2009-07-19 Thread ict Mapper ict department
Bacula version: (26 July 2008) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian 4.0 backup unit/changer: HP storageworks MSL2024 LTO3 Hello, We have a real weird problem. Tapes are not fully written. But this is not in all cases. The problem seems to concentrate around our monthly backups. When the tapes are labelled