Re: [Bacula-users] Restore from file really really slow

2007-11-08 Thread Julian Perry
>> >> i read somewhere, thats this problem is solved in newer versions of >> >> bacula (think it was 2.2.*). > > The thought of upgrading the whole environment to > > a 2.+ release is more that I could cope with right > > now! > I only have about 10 clients, but I did the whole thing in about 35

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore from file really really slow

2007-11-01 Thread Julian Perry
Thomas > i read somewhere, thats this problem is solved in newer versions of > bacula (think it was 2.2.*). > > The issue was, that a restore jobs reads the whole volume (as a > tapedrive does). In newer versions it does "seek" into the volume. I did wonder if it might be something like that. But

[Bacula-users] Restore from file really really slow

2007-11-01 Thread Julian Perry
Hi Version: 1.38.11 OS: Solaris 10 Device type: file Catalog: MySQL My backups run perfectly - I backup about 20 systems with a total of 2TB to file volumes, each one 2GB max. I have 5 deifferent devices (i.e. directories of volumes). I used to store the volumes on a large local disk, but now s

[Bacula-users] Restore from file really really slow

2007-10-20 Thread Julian Perry
Hi Version: 1.38.11 OS: Solaris 10 Device type: file Catalog: MySQL My backups run perfectly - I backup about 20 systems with a total of 2TB to file volumes, each one 2GB max. I have 5 deifferent devices (i.e. directories of volumes). I used to store the volumes on a large local disk, but now s