I just set this up and am generally having success. I do find that
label commands seem to hang mysteriously from time to time. I am still
coming up to speed with having a virtual autochanger now ...
Question - are you running bacula-sd as root?
Jay
On 1-Jul-05, at 4:36 PM, Richard White wrote
With some help... you need some funny scripting for this to work, or
you need to wait. This is one of the features that are on Kerns
to-do-list, but not yet implemented in the development version. See
Kern's mail "Re: [Bacula-devel] concurrent jobs with multiple-drive
autochanger" on bacula-dev
Actually I re-read the docs. It says that upping the max concurrent
jobs in the director is good - and they will be despooled exclusively
one by one to tape.
Cool - I will do that tonight and see how goes.
Jay
On 22-Jun-05, at 5:11 PM, Jay Lawrence wrote:
One thing that would be super
One thing that would be super desirable
I have a bunch of clients (5 so far) that I wanna back up
however
If the tape fills up, all the remaining jobs block waiting for the
tape to be free
worst case
The first client blocks - four 4 remaing jobs block until we can shove
in a new tape
ia type - or is there somewhere I should be reference both
Storage or Device declarations?
Thanks in advance (again!)
Jay
On 9-Jun-05, at 2:53 PM, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
Jay Lawrence wrote:
I tried to research the docs and the list - but I just can't quite
get it.
At my site, I
I tried to research the docs and the list - but I just can't quite get
it.
At my site, I have a lot more to backup than a single tape can handle.
It would be nice to get bigger drives - but the more cost effective
solution right now is to use several smaller tape drives. Is it
possible to hav
