Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-23 Thread Janusz Syrytczyk
> Status update. I just finished the first backup job which was 3.6 Gb. It > took 2.5 hours to run. avg speeds finished around 500k/s. > > I've gone as far again to reboot the library and the server and still no > changes. I'm not sure what i'm over looking. I have 1T of data to backup > on one

Re: [Bacula-users] Backing up more than 200 servers

2010-03-16 Thread Janusz Syrytczyk
> Yes, agreed. Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not yet readily available on all > platforms except by building from source. I was looking at this the > other day to see whether it was feasible yet to upgrade all of my > machines, and finding that (for example) Debian and Ubuntu still have > no stable pac

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir 3.0.3 dies on second job run or manual reload.

2009-12-18 Thread Janusz Syrytczyk
On Monday 14 December 2009 09:27:40 Bruno Friedmann wrote: > On 12/09/2009 12:11 AM, Janusz Syrytczyk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've upgraded to 3.0.3 from 3.0.2 a while ago and I'm facing serious > > problems with bacula-dir stability. > > > > Just

[Bacula-users] bacula-dir 3.0.3 dies on second job run or manual reload.

2009-12-08 Thread Janusz Syrytczyk
Hi, I've upgraded to 3.0.3 from 3.0.2 a while ago and I'm facing serious problems with bacula-dir stability. Just after its start, Director is able to perform any request I have (perform a backup, restore, reload etc.). But once I've got the task done, Director stops listening me - the seco