Re: [Bacula-users] License question

2006-04-27 Thread Hugo Schlebnik
Wow, thanks for all the advice, everyone.Kern, it's good to know you're okay with this idea.  That's obviously important from a moral standpoint, even if it's not a critical factor legally.  I'm pretty limited in what I can disclose about the project right now, thanks to an NDA, but that may change

Re: [Bacula-users] License question

2006-04-26 Thread Hugo Schlebnik
Thanks for all this information.  I'll try to clarify a bit more and see if that helps shed some light:   I am indeed talking about the binary, not the source.  I have no intention of modifying the bacula client code, but rather integrating it (as is) into a larger, proprietary application.   Would

[Bacula-users] License question

2006-04-26 Thread Hugo Schlebnik
Hi,Not sure if I should send this to the devel list or this list, but here goes:I'm a bit confused about the different bacula components and their respective licenses.  From what I can tell, the win32 binary has an extremely open and unrestrictive license, but most related components (including the