On 18.12.2015 18:01, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 12/18/15 11:56, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> If you have hundreds of users with root access and they can access the
>> Bacula Director machine as root, you have a far bigger security problem
>> than just Bacula, since they can do anything to y
sure when you fully understand Bacula's security and
> apply "normal" *nix security (sudo, ...) on top of it, you will have a
> secure backup system.
>
> Best regards,
> Kern
>
> On 12/18/2015 05:34 PM, H. Steuer wrote:
>>
>> Hello Bill,
>>
>> you
fd.conf Director section which then grants you
administrative privileges in the director.
Thanks for your support so far, let me know your thoughts
Cheers,
Heri
On 18.12.2015 17:19, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 10:30 AM, H. Steuer wrote:
>> Hello Bill,
>>
>> t
anual.
HOWEVER: In a network with "hundreds of hosts", you really should be
taking enterprise support and not trying to cut corners by using the
community version.
On 18/12/15 13:36, H. Steuer wrote:
Hello,
our current understanding of the bacula security model is, that it is
not poss
Hello,
our current understanding of the bacula security model is, that it is
not possible to disable the anonymous aka default console.
This leads to the fact that all users having root access to one of the
clients does have access to all data that was backed up
by bacula.
In a network with hundre
