Re: [Bacula-users] sg device node stickyness

2014-10-22 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
On Wednesday 22 October 2014 10:24:53 Robert Oschwald wrote: > Using Bacula Server 7.0.4 on CentOS6_64. > > One thing which annoys me is that the sg device node for TapeAlert changes > with every reboot from /dev/sg4 to /dev/sg6 and vice versa. > Is there any setting I can set in udev to get stic

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling problem.

2014-10-18 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
On Saturday 18 October 2014 11:01:28 Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Just a comment here. Since you have "volume use duration = 7 days" and your > volume was used until 12:58 next day, I'm quite sure (don't know how is > your schedule configured) that this volume will be available (append) for > use

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling problem.

2014-10-18 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
On Friday 17 October 2014 09:11:54 Josh Fisher wrote: >Generally, schedules are starting jobs at the same time of day. It follows >that the time period between successive runs will tend to be very nearly an >integer number of days. If the use duration is also an integer number of days, >then it

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling problem.

2014-10-18 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
On Friday 17 October 2014 21:41:49 Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Hi Giuseppe, > > Yes, this could happen if bacula couldn't find a reciclable volume and you > have the "purge oldest volume = yes" directive configured and this is, for > Bacula, the oldest volume. The purge oldest volume doesn't res

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling problem.

2014-10-18 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
> Consider how Bacula treats the case where "maximum volume jobs = 1". The job > starts to run and selects a volume marked "append", possibly first recycling > a volume if no available "append" volumes are empty. It then marks the volume > as "used" so that no other jobs will try to select it. A

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling problem.

2014-10-17 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
On Friday 17 October 2014 12:05:35 Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Hi Giuseppe, > > I would like to append some comments here about your "volume use duration" > configuration. As the directive name says, this is used to leave the volume > available for Bacula "during" your backup jobs (at least the

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling problem.

2014-10-16 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
0529L4" on device "lto1" (/dev/nlto1), all previous data lost. This configuration of bacula had been running for quite a while without a glitch, almost 10 months now and I had not any hardware error on my library at the time of this job, at least for what I can see. I ca

[Bacula-users] Recycling problem.

2014-10-15 Thread Giuseppe Vitillaro
I can't understand why the bacula director, 5.2.13 under a stable updated gentoo, recycled one volume "000506L4", the correct one in the slot 9 of my changer, but instead the storage daemon recycled the current volume mounted in drive1, from slot4, volume "000529L4" and without actually doing any p