Re: [Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups

2007-01-30 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Georg wrote: > > --On Montag, 29. Januar 2007 18:07 +0100 Cosimo Streppone > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Using DVD-RAM in combination with bacula is on my projects list. Is > >> anybody actually doing this? > > [...] > > I'm in the first

Re: [Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups

2007-01-29 Thread Cosimo Streppone
> Using DVD-RAM in combination with bacula is on my projects list. Is anybody > actually doing this? Yes, I am doing this on my home Linux workstation. I use a Samsung GSA-2164D dvdrecorder with a plain (no cartridge) DVD-RAM disk. I'm in the first stage of "try-and-see-what-happens" and I configu

[Bacula-users] Can a volume change trigger a Full backup?

2006-12-22 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Hi to all, I have the following situation. A linux box with fd + sd on it has to make a daily backup. The backup level is always incremental. Backup goes to a disk storage (2 external usb hdd) that rotate "randomly". What I don't know how to do is to trigger a Full backup whenever the drives are r

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Bacula 1.36.3: backup ok, restore fails

2006-01-27 Thread Cosimo Streppone
2006/1/27, Sam Briesemeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Cosimo, > > [...] > Removing the optimizations worked for me, but I suspect that if > you've removed them and it's still not working, then there's some other > configuration/options that your compiler is using and it's causing errors. > ... so you

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Bacula 1.36.3: backup ok, restore fails

2006-01-27 Thread Cosimo Streppone
> On 1/25/06, Cosimo Streppone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2006/1/18, Samuel Briesemeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > [...] ... I've since recompiled and it works now, though I'm not sure to > what extent. > > > I'll try recompi

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Bacula 1.36.3: backup ok, restore fails

2006-01-25 Thread Cosimo Streppone
2006/1/18, Samuel Briesemeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] ... I've since recompiled and it works now, though I'm not sure to what > extent. > I'll try recompiling it with no optimizations. I also tried recompiling with `-O0' but it makes no difference. The error remains. -- Cosimo

[Bacula-users] Re: Bacula 1.36.3: backup ok, restore fails

2006-01-18 Thread Cosimo Streppone
[cc'd to bacula-users] 2006/1/14, Samuel: > I'm Sam. I'm a sysadmin using Bacula on a 64-bit machine as well, running > Gentoo, and it appears we've encountered similar problems. A record of my > situation is posted here: http://sial.org/pbot/15428 Mmh.. Looks quite similar to my case. > I foun

[Bacula-users] Backup with bacula 32-bit, Restore with bacula 64-bit...?

2005-08-05 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Here I am again with my problem. I have to dig some more into this problem, also to build a useful report for this list. In the meanwhile, I'd like to ask: is it possible to do a backup on machine "box1" which is a 32-bit system with bacula file daemon 1.34.3, and then do a restore on machine "bo

[Bacula-users] Bacula 1.36.3: backup ok, restore fails

2005-07-06 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Hello to the list, I'm having a problem with bacula 1.36.3. I used successfully 1.34.2 for some months on another machine. Now I have this RHEL 4.0 amd64 box (2 processors), I built bacula from source rpms. I tested 1.36.3 rebuilding my old configuration and doing many backups successfully. Now tr

[Bacula-users] RedHat Enteprise 4.0 x86_64 bacula rpms

2005-06-22 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Hi all, just a quick note to let you know that I built some bacula rpms for RHEL 4.0 x86_64. Please keep in mind that I'm a total rpmbuild newbie. If anyone is interested, I can provide download urls, or upload them somewhere convenient. BTW: I don't know how to build bacula-server-*.rpm and oth