Hi guys
I have got a question that I was wondering how does bacula pick a pool for a
manual job.
If my memory serviced me correct the correct pool was picked in version 2.0.3
when you run the backup manually. But now it defaults to the Default pool
everytime. If the jobs are scheduled the rig
On this subject, I have upgraded from 2.0.3 to 2.2.3 and had the following
problem.
If you start a manual run, the first job start and when you start a second run
the console freeze up for about 2 minutes and then everything is normal
again, is this normal.
Thanks
Christoff
On Thursday 13 Se
Hi all
I must say I am very, VERY happy with Bacula. Backing up around 1,7TB of
data. This is now the total size of everything that needs to be backed up.
This all happen to disks. Currently have 5 700G hard drives. Reason is
that I am splitting the servers between the disks. Bacula treat disks li
On Sunday 09 September 2007 23:46:24 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
>
> Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
> missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because w
On Friday 07 September 2007 08:32:41 Tom Sommer wrote:
> On Thu, September 6, 2007 23:36, Steve Thompson wrote:
> > Bacula 2.0.3, director is 32-bit CentOS 4.5, clients are all CentOS 4.5,
> > both 32-bit and 64-bit. Backups are to disk files.
> >
> > I find that I cannot do any restores:
> >
> >
>
Hi all
I am struggling to get the rescue cd's to boot but no luck. I am following the
instructions on the README. Can anybody please tell me what I am doing wrong.
OS: Centos 4.3
1. cp rescue and source code to /bacula and unpack it.
2. Goto /bacula/bacula-rescue-2.0.0
3. ./configure --with-dev
On Friday 24 August 2007 14:16:47 Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:02:29 +0000, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:54:45 -0400, Frank Sweetser wrote:
> >> Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> I am
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:16:47 +, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:02:29 +0000, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:54:45 -0400, Frank Sweetser wrote:
>>
>>> Christoff van Zyl wrote:
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
&g
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:02:29 +, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:54:45 -0400, Frank Sweetser wrote:
>
>> Christoff van Zyl wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I am busy pulling my hair out of my head on this error, but no luck. I
>>>
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:54:45 -0400, Frank Sweetser wrote:
> Christoff van Zyl wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I am busy pulling my hair out of my head on this error, but no luck. I
>> am running Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS with bacula -2.0.3 compiled from source.
>> Iwas wonde
Hi all
I am busy pulling my hair out of my head on this error, but no luck. I
am running Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS with bacula -2.0.3 compiled from source.
Iwas wondering if anybody can help me on my mistake, I have googled
but no luck.
Help would really be appreciated.
Thanks
Christoff
Creating the
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:37:38 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 17.07.2007 09:25,, Christoff van Zyl wrote::
>> I really need so advise on what can I use for Maximum Volume Bytes on a
>> disk, currently I am using 5g. If a backup a server consist of 180G there
>> is
I really need so advise on what can I use for Maximum Volume Bytes on a
disk, currently I am using 5g. If a backup a server consist of 180G there
is a lot of volumes, what size can I use to get the best performance to do
a restore?
I have tested 15G and still looks good and the restores is fast.
13 matches
Mail list logo
