Hello list,
I would like to tell you about a problem we're having after upgrading
bacula 2.2.6 to 5.0.3.
In our setup we have the main bacula server (director and storage) with
a LTO3 tape drive. All jobs are done on this server using his local
storage (storage1). The is also another storage daem
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Cedric Devillers wrote:
>
>> too) you can use /dev/tape/by-id/scsi-XX-nst that should be fixed by
>> using specific id (instead of XX).
>
> Looking at that directory it's only been created for the first tape drive.
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>
>>> You can write a udev rule to lock the drives down. I wrote one awhile
>>> back to keep the changer device the same.
>>>
>>> dev6 ~ # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/55-bacula.rules
>>> SUBSYSTEM=="scsi",ATTRS{vendor}=="EXABYTE*",ATTRS{type
ll, even in trace file) may
be considered as a bug, but i've only seen this on a old 1.38 release.
Have a good day.
Cedric Devillers wrote:
> Cedric Devillers wrote:
>> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 13.11.2007 12:54,, Cedric Devillers wrote
Cedric Devillers wrote:
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 13.11.2007 12:54,, Cedric Devillers wrote::
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a little problem with one of our bacula installation.
>>>
>>> Let me explain the setup first.
>>
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 13.11.2007 12:54,, Cedric Devillers wrote::
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a little problem with one of our bacula installation.
>>
>> Let me explain the setup first.
>>
>> There is two server, the first has the data
Hello,
I have a little problem with one of our bacula installation.
Let me explain the setup first.
There is two server, the first has the data and the storage daemon
(meia). The second is the director/DB server (lucita). There is alsa two
client only servers (hr-accentv2 a windows client and da
Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:58:13 +0200, Marc Cousin said:
>> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 16:59:10 Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:54:37 +0200, Cousin Marc said:
I think the problem is linked to the fact dbcheck works more or less row
by ro
Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:54:37 +0200, Cousin Marc said:
>> I think the problem is linked to the fact dbcheck works more or less row by
>> row.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the problem is that you have duplicates in the
>> path
>> table as the error comes from
>> S
Hello,
I must run dbcheck on my bacula database (postgresql backend) because of
"sql_create.c:767 More than one Path!" warning on every file backed up
(don't know where it comes from, actually).
The operation is extremely slow, it ran for the all week-end and only
deleted 2000 from the 51000 dup
Michel Meyers wrote:
> Aitor wrote:
>> Hi,
>> In Spanish: Español, Catalán, Inglés
>> In Catalan: Espanyol, Català, Anglés.
>
> In French: espagnol, catalan, anglais
Maybe you should add for French : espagnol (castillan), catalan, anglais ?
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
