Re: [Bacula-users] slow copy job from disk to LTO-6 (speed issue)

2017-03-27 Thread Caribe Schreiber
a single client, you are doing very well. > > Best regards, > > Kern > > > On 03/27/2017 03:30 PM, Caribe Schreiber wrote: >> Thanks for all the good suggestions! >> >> After enabling spooling, the speed increased to where it ought to be: >> >> b

Re: [Bacula-users] slow copy job from disk to LTO-6 (speed issue)

2017-03-27 Thread Caribe Schreiber
istics, big hardware, > and Bacula tuning experience (what directives to use and what values > to set -- e.g. do not use Bacula compression, encryption, ... if you > want the LTO-6 running full speed). > > Best regards, > > Kern > > > On 03/26/2017 05:24 AM, Caribe

[Bacula-users] slow copy job from disk to LTO-6 (speed issue)

2017-03-25 Thread Caribe Schreiber
from the bacula copy job speeds. I'm hoping the collective wisdom of the list can give me some ideas on other places to look for speed issues or config changes so that I don't prematurely wear out this drive head with shoe-shining (of course...faster backups are always welcome too!). Thank

[Bacula-users] slow copy job from disk to LTO-6 (speed issue)

2017-03-25 Thread Caribe Schreiber
Geesh...somehow the line endings got all munched up on my console output in the last email. Hopefully this is actually readable. Sorry for the double post! ~Caribe Here's the output for a moderate size copy job going from local disk (FileChgr1-Dev1) to the SAS attached LTO-6 tape (Drive-1) show

[Bacula-users] slow copy job from disk to LTO-6 (speed issue)

2017-03-25 Thread Caribe Schreiber
Hi all, I'm looking for some advice on how to diagnose a speed issue with a disk-to-tape copy job from a relatively fast RAID array to an LTO-6 drive over SAS. My local copy jobs seem to be limited to ~23MB/s which is well below the 54-160MB/s speed specified for the adaptive streaming on this dr

Re: [Bacula-users] Hostname not found

2017-02-10 Thread Caribe Schreiber
> ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- *Caribe Schreiber* *Auction Harmony* Phone: (612) 605-7301 x 105 Fax: (612) 605-7302 www.AuctionHarmony.com <

Re: [Bacula-users] btape multivolume fill test fails on 7.4.4 but succeeds on 5.2.13

2017-02-09 Thread Caribe Schreiber
ing a version 7.4.5, since the fill command is >> important >> when doing a new installation. >> >> Best regards, >> Kern >> >> On 01/28/2017 10:42 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> > Actually, the situation is a bit more complicat

Re: [Bacula-users] btape multivolume fill test fails on 7.4.4 but succeeds on 5.2.13

2017-01-27 Thread Caribe Schreiber
ocks differ at byte 0 The last block written and the block that was read back differ. The test FAILED This must be corrected before you use Bacula to write multi-tape Volumes. btape: btape.c:2407-0 do_unfill failed. ---end single volume fill breakage----- On 01/27/

[Bacula-users] btape multivolume fill test fails on 7.4.4 but succeeds on 5.2.13

2017-01-26 Thread Caribe Schreiber
Hi all, I'm hoping someone can help point me in the right direction to get the btape multivolume fill test to work under bacula-7.4.4. I've got an HP 1/8 G2 Autoloader with an LTO-6 SAS drive running under gentoo linux with kernel 4.4.39 and the linux st drivers. The firmware on both the drive a