Re: [Bacula-users] Volume name: conflicting variable expansion after upgrade to bacula 13

2025-01-31 Thread Brian Candler
I've noticed something which has changed from the bacula 9->13 upgrade. Looking at logs from December, before the upgrade, I find that *all* the backups were using storage "FileStorage0" and media type "File0".  And yet, the load was still shared 50/50 between devices FileDev0 and FileDev1. r

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume name: conflicting variable expansion after upgrade to bacula 13

2025-01-28 Thread Brian Candler
On 28/01/2025 19:48, Martin Simmons wrote: Actually, I think job 92925 runs first (according to the timestamps in the logs, which are not in order for some reason) and creates the volume using FileStorage0. Then, for some reason, the SD refuses to use FileStorage0 for job 92925, which makes it s

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume name: conflicting variable expansion after upgrade to bacula 13

2025-01-28 Thread Brian Candler
[Continuation] Configurations are below, and nothing really has changed since upgrading from 9.4.2 to 13.0.4. The upgrade was done via in-place upgrades of the backup server from Ubuntu 20.04 -> 22.04 -> 24.04.  The first upgrade removed bacula entirely (since bacula was dropped from the jam

[Bacula-users] Volume name: conflicting variable expansion after upgrade to bacula 13

2025-01-28 Thread Brian Candler
tes. The "Source address bind error" comes from DirSourceAddress and I've separately raised this as an issue at https://gitlab.bacula.org/bacula-community-edition/bacula-community/-/issues/2742 I don't *think* it's related, but I'll run without DirSourceAddress