On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 09:42, Radosław Korzeniewski <
rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pon., 28 wrz 2020 o 14:34 Ben Laurie napisał(a):
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 18:58, Josip Deanovic
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 18:58, Josip Deanovic
wrote:
> On Sunday 2020-09-13 15:43:31 Ben Laurie wrote:
> > > Not sure if IgnoreCase option could caused it somehow.
> >
> > According to the documentation it just makes it ignore case for pattern
> > matching, so s
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 01:53, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020, at 6:23 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> I restored a Windows incremenental backup (to a FreeBSD machine).
>
> The restore job looks like:
>
> Build OS: amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1 freebsd
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 13:20, Josip Deanovic
wrote:
> On Saturday 2020-09-12 18:08:41 Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Hmmm!
> >
> > # find . | wc -l
> > 4422
> > # find . -type f | wc
> > 32868013 360780
> > # find . -not -type d | wc
> >
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 14:16, Josip Deanovic
wrote:
> On Saturday 2020-09-12 09:27:51 Heitor Faria wrote:
> > Hello Ben,
> >
> > Perhaps you could check the difference between the "list files jobid=xx"
> > and the list of restored files?
>
> Good idea but he already got the number of files when t
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 13:37, Josip Deanovic
wrote:
> On Saturday 2020-09-12 12:18:05 Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Hmmm.
> >
> > I don't think I have that problem...
> [...]
>
>
> What about:
>
> File = c:/ <- this
>
ivirus
WildDir = "c:/ProgramData/Microsoft/Windows Defender"
# Stuff that has errors (and is no longer used)
WildDir = "j:/Windows"
}
File = c:/
File = j:/
File = k:/
File = c:/Users/camil/OneDrive
}
}
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 12:03, Josip Deano
I restored a Windows incremenental backup (to a FreeBSD machine).
The restore job looks like:
Build OS: amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1 freebsd 12.1-SYNTH
JobId: 92
Job:RestoreFiles.2020-09-12_10.36.22_08
Restore Client: b2-fd
Where:
I had this problem the other day, even tho I do have automatic volume
recycling, which has always worked in the past. I had to purge one of the
expired volumes to get it to accept it...
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 10:51, Radosław Korzeniewski <
rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> śr., 6 lut
On 31 January 2018 at 10:26, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 31/01/18 10:14, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > I also have that on my LTO3 drive.
>
> You should test this using the fill command in btape (which will test
> with uncompressible data). if the block size is set correctly you're
I also have that on my LTO3 drive.
On 21 December 2017 at 23:08, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Bacula 7.4.7 on FreeBSD 11
>
> What Bytes/block are you using for your LTO4 tapes?
>
> I ask because I just noticed:
>
> ###
> Device tape is "LTO_0" (/dev/nsa0) mounted with:
> Volum
May not be relevant that this is Windows, but ... in the docs it says
that if a change is made to a FileSet, the next backup will be a full
backup.
However, I am trying to tune a windows fileset, and two things are happening:
1. If I change the FileSet then run a backup, it is an incremental back
On 2 April 2014 14:01, John Drescher wrote:
>> To be clear: raw, uncompressed bytes (even if the compression was done
>> by Bacula)?
>
> Yes.
Thanks!
--
___
Bacula-users mailin
On 2 April 2014 14:01, John Drescher wrote:
>> To be clear: raw, uncompressed bytes (even if the compression was done
>> by Bacula)?
>
> Yes.
Thanks!
--
___
Bacula-users mailin
On 2 April 2014 13:55, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>> I recently swapped out my LTO-2 drive for an LTO-3 drive, but I'm
>> still using LTO-2 tapes.
>>
>> The current tape is still going strong and the latest backup
I recently swapped out my LTO-2 drive for an LTO-3 drive, but I'm
still using LTO-2 tapes.
The current tape is still going strong and the latest backup says:
Last Volume Bytes: 607,752,327,168 (607.7 GB)
which seems like quite a lot for a 200GB tape. Now, I realise the
drive can do compre
2012/1/6 Josh Fisher :
> On 1/6/2012 2:35 AM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
>
> In case of hardware (tape or disk) failure... Don't really know how to
> recover from such situation.
> For tapes, bacula should instruct you when a tape should be changed... I
> don't know how bacula decides a tape has to
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Alex Crow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have set up a backup server that uses encryption in the File Daemon.
> However we find it is really slow, in fact we are only getting about
> 80Mbps (megabits, not -bytes) throughput while running 4 backup threads.
> This is backing up
On 29/01/2010 13:39, John Drescher wrote:
> Are you sure the job is not promoting your backup to full? Not sure if
> that was asked above.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure. For example, I am running an incremental right now.
stat dir says:
JobId Level Name Status
==
On 29/01/2010 12:33, Dan Langille wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>> On 28/01/2010 15:23, John Stoffel wrote:
>>> Ben> No suggestions?
>>> Ben> Can someone tell me how to list the files that were backed up? Even
>>> Ben> better, how to find out _why_
On 28/01/2010 15:23, John Stoffel wrote:
>
> Ben> No suggestions?
> Ben> Can someone tell me how to list the files that were backed up? Even
> Ben> better, how to find out _why_ they were backed up?
>
> list files jobid=#
>
> should give you a list of files backed up for a job.
Should I exp
No suggestions?
Can someone tell me how to list the files that were backed up? Even
better, how to find out _why_ they were backed up?
On 27/01/2010 14:32, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 27/01/2010 13:50, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Ben Laurie wrote:
>>> Firstly: apologies if this issue is
On 27/01/2010 13:50, Dan Langille wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>> Firstly: apologies if this issue is well known, gmane says this list
>> either doesn't exist or is not indexed, so I can't search it :-(
>
> Try marc.info
>
>> I installed Bacula 3.0.3 from
Firstly: apologies if this issue is well known, gmane says this list
either doesn't exist or is not indexed, so I can't search it :-(
I installed Bacula 3.0.3 from source on my ReadyNAS as a client to my
FreeBSD 3.0.3 server. It seems to work OK, but incremental and
differential backups back up fa
24 matches
Mail list logo
