>> Once a year, I need to create a full backup that will be stored
>> off-site. This backup will not be readily available for normal
>> restores. The obvious approach would be to delete that backup (and
>> its volumes) from the catalog so they will not be considered when
>> performing future back
Once a year, I need to create a full backup that will be stored
off-site. This backup will not be readily available for normal
restores. The obvious approach would be to delete that backup (and
its volumes) from the catalog so they will not be considered when
performing future backups/restores.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester
wrote:
> Yup it's pretty dumb that the default configuration only recognizes one
> magazine atleast
> this was the case for us. You have to go into the web interface or menu and
> specify "both"
That did it, thanks!
--
I just hooked up my shiny new Powervault 124T with dual magazines to
an Ubuntu 10.04 server via SAS. For some reason, mtx can only see the
first (left) magazine. The output of mtx is below.
The front panel interface sees all 16 slots just fine.
Any suggestions?
-Ben
root:~# mtx -f /dev/sg4 in
I'm doing disk-to-disk backups. Since backup sets fluctuate in size
quite a bit, it's hard to tell how many volumes may be available to be
recycled. This makes it difficult to tell when I need to add
additional disks. As it stands, I may have hit a peak in backup size
several months ago and may
On 10/31/07, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> see
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998
>
> "After version 2.2.x Python will no longer be support -- there are an
> insufficient number of users."
Oy vey!
I am even as we speak working on implementing some Python code to
handle volume labeling!
The example DirStartup.py shows an example NewVolume method that just
assigns a generated volume name to job.VolumeName. Is that all that's
needed for the system to label a new volume? Does it just label a new
volume using the defaults defined in bacula-dir.conf?
Thanks!
-Ben
-
I feel like I'm missing something:
If I'm doing all of my backups to disk, is there an advantage to
maintaining three distinct pools?
Thanks!
-Ben
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log
