Re: [Bacula-users] Retention period calculation

2023-01-30 Thread Antonino Balsamo
recommend you to set JobRetention less than or equal to VolumeRetention to avoid the volume to be pruned before the Job Retention has expired. Best, Ana On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:26 AM Antonino Balsamo wrote: Hello, I have a shell script generating my bacula configs. Is th

[Bacula-users] Retention period calculation

2023-01-28 Thread Antonino Balsamo
Hello, I have a shell script generating my bacula configs. Is there any enhancements, error or whatever in calculating the retention period as per below? (it is a no-recycle scenario) #days to keep records in months, min 1 RETENTION=2 FILERETENTION=$(($RETENTION*30+40)) VOLUMERETENTION=$(($

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume purged if no files on it, regardless of retention period.

2022-09-05 Thread Antonino Balsamo
rely on it for restoring. Le 5 septembre 2022 12:49:56 GMT+02:00, Antonino Balsamo a écrit : Hello, my scenario is a one job per volume with no recycle and 90 days retention period, usual full/diff/incr pools. It happens that from time to time (if there are no files in the job d

[Bacula-users] Volume purged if no files on it, regardless of retention period.

2022-09-05 Thread Antonino Balsamo
Hello, my scenario is a one job per volume with no recycle and 90 days retention period, usual full/diff/incr pools. It happens that from time to time (if there are no files in the job due to no filesystem change) that Bacula purge a volume within the retention period. Is that possible and

[Bacula-users] cloud_dev could not open Cloud driver type=1 for Device=CloudStorage

2019-06-28 Thread Antonino Balsamo
HI. I'm running bacula 9.4.2 on stretch with debian packages from stretch-backports. I've added the cloud plugin from the Bacula package and I got the following error: JobId 2: Fatal error: cloud_dev.c:690 Could not open Cloud driver type=1 for Device=CloudStorage Then I removed all packag

[Bacula-users] Cloud Service/Object Storage

2019-06-23 Thread Antonino Balsamo
Hello, just read the whitepaper about volume sync on the cloud. https://blog.bacula.org/whitepapers/ObjectStorage.pdf Question is: in a such scenario, volume recycle does make sense or not? I guess no, as the volumes are always new and moved to the cloud. Anyway, there's a limit in numbering t

[Bacula-users] Bacula, S3, path to the right way?

2015-10-21 Thread Antonino Balsamo
hi all, I'll not bother you on the usage of s3fs and other pieces of software. For having tested this, keeping s3 + s3fs + ec2 + storage daemon is not reliable as it should be for backup (!) purpose. Proposed scenario: transfer the volume after write is complete, and delete after successful mo